Susan Rice is the Wrong Choice to Replace Hillary Clinton for Secretary of State

It’s rare that something like a cabinet appointment gets much attention this early into the lame duck session. However, as Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is not staying on for President Obama’s second term, all eyes are on the candidate who will replace the politician who has undoubtedly become the most invaluable member of the president’s cabinet.

Even after falling on the sword for Benghazi, Secretary Clinton has been something of a Teflon secretary. Unlike Eric HolderJanet Napolitano or Tim Geithner, bad news does not seem to stick to her. Now she’s due to leave next year, and the most likely candidate to replace her is…

Susan Rice?

The U.N. ambassador might normally be a shoe-in for the post. She has years of experience, is extremely well educated, and is incredibly competent, at least according to the president and his supporters. Then came September 16th. When Ambassador Rice made the rounds on the Sunday morning news talk circuit, she discussed over and over again how the U.S. consulate in Libya was the result of blowback due to a YouTube video entitled “The Innocence of Muslims.” The amateurish film painted the Muslim Prophet Mohammad in a rather unfavorable light (to say the least) which lead to protests at numerous U.S. embassies and consulates around the world. The consulate in Benghazi bore the worst of it. Four Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens, were murdered during an attack on the anniversary of 9/11.

After the hearings involving former CIA Director David Petraeus, it became clear that Susan Rice was not sticking to the CIA’s initial talking points. Petraeus now claims that the CIA knew it was an Al-Qaeda terrorist attack within hours, and prepared a series of talking points centered on that knowledge. However, when Susan Rice went on television the following Sunday, those talking points had been expunged.

The question then becomes, as CBS News reports,why did the CIA and the FBI sign off on it when the office of the Director of National Intelligence ordered the talking points removed? Was Ambassador Rice even aware that they had previously existed?

Love her or hate her, Hillary Clinton is no dummy, and she is no fool. Do Americans really want their next secretary of state to be someone who is easily duped?

Anyone can make a mistake, but Ambassador Rice has a history that is peppered with hints of cronyism. In the 2002 book written by Samantha Powers, Ms. Rice attempted to defend the Clinton administration’s inaction regarding the 1994 Rwandan genocide. In Power’s book, Rice is quoted as saying, “If we use the word ‘genocide’ and are seen as doing nothing, what will be the effect on the November congressional election?” Rice was later said to have been involved in a scheme along with Madeline Albright, Anthony Lake and several others to remove the words “genocide” and “ethnic cleansing” from all memos on the subject. Too harsh, apparently, unless you were a Tutsi.

In 1997, when President Clinton attempted to move Ms. Rice into the position of Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs, several members of the Congressional Black Caucus objected. They claimes not only that Ms. Rice was part of the “Washington elite class,”but also posed questions about her having worked for several African dictators with less than stellar records in the past. As ambassador to the United Nations, Rice has missed several key votes that should have had the American voice on record.

The idea of Ambassador Rice now being tapped for Secretary of State is now being questioned by many people in Congress. Nearly 100 members of the House are calling for another choice, while in the Senate, Senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham have had less than glowing things to say about Ms. Rice. Of course, in an attempt to shut Republicans up, the left is simply calling them racists. How wonderfully typical.

It wasn’t sexist to point out that George W. Bush’s attempt to appoint Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court may not have the best possible choice. It’s not sexist or racist to call into question someone’s history, especially if that person will be running the State Department.

Susan Rice comes with too many questions and too many questionable acts. Whether she is just a dupe, or she is knee-deep in the suspected Benghazi cover-up, she is far from the best choice to head the State Department.

view profile

by Jesse Merkel

A Rochester NY native, Jesse began writing professionally in January 2011 after receiving his Associate’s from Genesee Community College. Jesse currently works as an SEO writer for HubShout.com, while also writing about the political scene in Rochester for Examiner.com. For the past five years he has spent much of his free time volunteering on campaigns both local and national, while also working as the Rochester head of the nationally registered 2012 Draft Sarah Committee PAC. Prior to becoming a writer, Jesse worked as a professional guitarist and private music instructor for over seven and a half years. 
Original article can be found at http://www.policymic.com/articles/19411/susan-rice-is-the-wrong-choice-to-replace-hillary-clinton-for-secretary-of-state

One response

  1. Susan or any one chosen by the current administration is not the right choice for a free America for ALL people. Why should you seek one to lead, who has shown one’s heart questionable to truth? Are we blinded to the truth also? Can America be completely taken over without a physical fight? Yes, if we continue to make questionable selections and ignore the signs God has given us; Three open microphones, the incident in Libya, five TV appearances to cover over the truth of the deaths of Americans in Benghazi,then the timing of the revelation of the affair and the discovery of Fast and furious that killed hundreds in Mexico and an American.

    We must not blame God upon the destruction of His America by mankind, chosen by us. We exchanged our freedom for phones and money and favors and silence to keep from being called racist if we spoke out for His word or disagree with anything the leaders say. “Stand fast therefore in the liberty by which Christ has made us free, and do not be entangled again with a yoke of bondage.” (Galatians 5:1)

    We were warned to “Beware lest any one cheat you through philosophy and empty deceit, according to the tradition of men, according to the basic principles of the world, and not according to Christ. (Colossians 2:8)

    November 23, 2012 at 7:14 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s